Felon disenfranchisement Essay -- Criminal Justice

One of the more controversial debates in directlys political arena, especially around election times, is that of felon disenfranchisement. The disenfranchisement of felons, or the practice of denying felons and ex-felons the right to take, has been in practice before the colonization of the States and traces back to early England however, it has not become so controversial and publicise until recent times. In todays political system, felons and ex-felons are the lonesome(prenominal) competent adults that are denied the right to vote the total of those banned to vote is approximately 4.7 million men and women, over two percent of the body politics population (Reiman 3). Many people believe that felons do not deserve the right to vote. For these people, voting is not an inherent right alternatively it is a privilege given to deserving people that wish to do work a positive change to their lives. Some believe that, there is no reason for a felon to vote or to debate active w hether or not they have that rightthey made the choice to match the law, so why should they have any say in reservation it? Siegel In this point of view, giving felons the right to vote is similar to recognise them. With the right to vote, felons are still able to sway decisions regarding the lives of a night club they are no longer a part of. Felons are meant to be punished, stripped of numerous rights including that of voting. Punishments, then, are made to restrict a person, not give them more freedom and decision. If felons are allowed to vote, one must take care the effects it would have on the elections. Many people believe that felons founder the wrong choices for a reason, that they are clearly lacking something law-abiding citizens have. prof Christopher Manfredi ... ..., Parole, and Community Corrections. Upper Saddle River Prentice Hall, 2005.Jeffrey Reiman. Liberal and Republican Arguments Against the Disenfranchisement of Felons. abomin able rightness Ethics 24.1 (2005) 3-18. Criminal Justice Periodicals. ProQuest. Ryan Library, New Rochelle, NY. 13 Dec. 2007. http//www.proquest.com/.Losing the Vote. 1998. The Sentencing Project. 11 Jan. 2007. http//www.hrw.org/reports98/vote/usvot98o.htm.Siegel, Larry J. Criminology. 8th ed. Lowell Thomson Wadsworth, 2003.United States. post of Justice Statistics. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002. Albany The Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center, 2003.United States. Federal Bureau of Investigations. Uniform Crime Reports. Sept. 2007. 12 Feb 2007. http//www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius2006/index.html